The four marketing numbers a construction MD should actually see
Most reports in this sector are long, colourful and useless to the person receiving them. Four numbers answer the only question that matters.
Most marketing reports in this sector are long, colourful and useless to the person they are sent to. Impressions, reach, sessions, click-through rates, keyword positions, engagement: an enormous amount of measurement, almost none of which answers the only question a managing director is actually asking, which is whether this is worth the money.
The problem is not that agencies are hiding something. It is that the numbers which are easy to report are not the numbers that matter, and nobody ever agreed which four to look at.
One: enquiries, by source
Not traffic. Enquiries. How many genuine enquiries arrived this month, and where did each one come from: organic search, paid search, social, referral, direct or the telephone.
This sounds basic and most firms in this sector cannot produce it, because calls are not tracked, form submissions land in an inbox nobody counts, and nothing distinguishes a real enquiry from a supplier trying to sell to you. Fixing that is the highest-value measurement job available, and it usually takes a fortnight.
Two: cost per enquiry
Total marketing spend for the period, agency fees included, divided by the number of genuine enquiries. One number, tracked monthly, telling you whether things are getting better or worse.
It will look alarming in the early months of any SEO or content work, because the cost is incurred well before the enquiries arrive. That is the correct behaviour for a compounding channel, and it is worth saying out loud before anybody panics at the third board meeting.
Three: what those enquiries turn into
The number almost nobody closes the loop on. Of the enquiries that arrived, how many became quotes, and how many quotes became work? A channel producing thirty enquiries that never convert is worse than one producing five that do, and no traffic report will ever tell you that.
This needs the sales side to record where work came from, which is usually the hard part. It is also the difference between marketing being an expense on a spreadsheet and an investment with a return you can put a number against.
Four: the leading indicators
Rankings for terms with intent
Not a keyword count. The specific searches you decided were worth winning, and whether you are moving on them.
Visibility in AI answers
Whether assistants name you when asked what your business does. Currently a manual check, and worth running once a month.
Enquiry response time
The average gap between an enquiry arriving and somebody replying. It is a marketing number even though it is a sales behaviour.
Content published
How many real pages actually went live. Almost everything else in a compounding channel follows from this, and it is the first thing to slip when a month gets busy.
What to stop looking at
Impressions and reach are context, not results. A month with more impressions and fewer enquiries is a worse month. Bounce rate is close to meaningless on a site where people frequently find what they need on the page they landed on. Rankings for terms nobody buys from are vanity dressed up as evidence.
None of these are dishonest measures. They are simply the ones that are easiest to make go up, which is precisely why they end up at the front of the report.
The conversation this makes possible
Once the four numbers exist, the monthly review changes character entirely. Instead of walking through a deck, you are answering three questions: is cost per enquiry moving in the right direction, are the enquiries converting, and did we publish what we said we would.
That is a conversation a managing director can have in fifteen minutes, and it makes it obvious quite quickly whether a channel deserves more budget or ought to be stopped, which is the entire point of measuring anything.
How to get the numbers if you do not have them
Most firms reading this cannot produce any of the four today, and the gap is usually smaller than it feels. It is a fortnight of setup rather than a system to procure.
Track phone calls
In this sector a large share of enquiries arrive by telephone and are invisible in every report anybody sends you. Call tracking attributes them to a source and it is inexpensive.
Give the form a destination that counts
Route enquiries somewhere they are logged rather than only emailed, even if that is a spreadsheet somebody updates daily.
Agree what counts as an enquiry
Write the definition down. Without it the number moves depending on who compiled it, and the trend stops meaning anything.
Record the source at quote stage
One extra field on the quote, completed by whoever took the call. This is the piece that connects marketing to revenue, and it is nearly always the one missing.
None of that requires a procurement project. It requires a decision about what gets recorded and somebody recording it consistently for three months, after which the four numbers exist and the arguments about marketing get considerably shorter.
Ask for these four. If nobody can produce them, that is the first month's work, and it is worth considerably more than another report.
One caution about benchmarks. Cost per enquiry varies enormously between a specialist manufacturer and a regional contractor, so comparing yours with an industry average is close to meaningless. The only comparison that matters is your own number last quarter, which is why the habit of recording it matters far more than the sophistication of whatever records it.
Reports you cannot act on?
Send us last month's marketing report. We will tell you what it is not telling you and what to ask for instead.
Get a straight read →
